0.11/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.11/0.12 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6rx2Be7x7p true 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 960 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 120 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 04:24:35 EDT 2022 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.11/0.32 % Running portfolio for 960 s 0.11/0.32 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.11/0.32 % Number of cores: 8 0.11/0.33 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.11/0.33 % Running in HO mode 0.65/0.63 % Total configuration time : 828 0.65/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1656 0.65/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0 0.70/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s 0.70/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s 1.11/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s 1.11/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s 1.11/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s 1.11/0.74 % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh. 1.11/0.74 % done 5 iterations in 0.010s 1.11/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 1.11/0.74 % SZS output start Refutation 1.11/0.74 thf(sk__type, type, sk_: $i > $i). 1.11/0.74 thf(sk__1_type, type, sk__1: $i > $i). 1.11/0.74 thf(sk__2_type, type, sk__2: $i). 1.11/0.74 thf(cTHM141_pme, conjecture, 1.11/0.74 (![Xf:( $i > $i )]: 1.11/0.74 ( ( ?[Xg:( $i > $i )]: 1.11/0.74 ( ( ![Xx:$i]: ( ( Xf @ ( Xg @ Xx ) ) = ( Xg @ ( Xf @ Xx ) ) ) ) & 1.11/0.74 ( ?[Xx:$i]: 1.11/0.74 ( ( ![Xz:$i]: ( ( ( Xg @ Xz ) = ( Xz ) ) => ( ( Xz ) = ( Xx ) ) ) ) & 1.11/0.74 ( ( Xg @ Xx ) = ( Xx ) ) ) ) ) ) => 1.11/0.74 ( ?[Xy:$i]: ( ( Xf @ Xy ) = ( Xy ) ) ) ))). 1.11/0.74 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, 1.11/0.74 (~( ![Xf:( $i > $i )]: 1.11/0.74 ( ( ?[Xg:( $i > $i )]: 1.11/0.74 ( ( ![Xx:$i]: ( ( Xf @ ( Xg @ Xx ) ) = ( Xg @ ( Xf @ Xx ) ) ) ) & 1.11/0.74 ( ?[Xx:$i]: 1.11/0.74 ( ( ![Xz:$i]: 1.11/0.74 ( ( ( Xg @ Xz ) = ( Xz ) ) => ( ( Xz ) = ( Xx ) ) ) ) & 1.11/0.74 ( ( Xg @ Xx ) = ( Xx ) ) ) ) ) ) => 1.11/0.74 ( ?[Xy:$i]: ( ( Xf @ Xy ) = ( Xy ) ) ) ) )), 1.11/0.74 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cTHM141_pme])). 1.11/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, (((sk__1 @ sk__2) = (sk__2))), 1.11/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 1.11/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 1.11/0.74 (![X0 : $i]: ((sk_ @ (sk__1 @ X0)) = (sk__1 @ (sk_ @ X0)))), 1.11/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 1.11/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, 1.11/0.74 (![X1 : $i]: (((X1) = (sk__2)) | ((sk__1 @ X1) != (X1)))), 1.11/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 1.11/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain, 1.11/0.74 (![X0 : $i]: 1.11/0.74 (((sk_ @ (sk__1 @ X0)) != (sk_ @ X0)) | ((sk_ @ X0) = (sk__2)))), 1.11/0.74 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2])). 1.11/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain, 1.11/0.74 ((((sk_ @ sk__2) != (sk_ @ sk__2)) | ((sk_ @ sk__2) = (sk__2)))), 1.11/0.74 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl7])). 1.11/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, (((sk_ @ sk__2) = (sk__2))), 1.11/0.74 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl14])). 1.11/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X2 : $i]: ((sk_ @ X2) != (X2))), 1.11/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 1.11/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, ($false), 1.11/0.74 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)], 1.11/0.74 [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl3])). 1.11/0.74 1.11/0.74 % SZS output end Refutation 1.11/0.74 1.11/0.74 1.11/0.74 % Terminating... 1.34/0.83 % Runner terminated. 1.34/0.84 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 1.34/0.85 EOF